1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 2000 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2000 Ford Windstar is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Windstar (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. (143 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Because 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 2000 Ford Windstar | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 2600 | Windstar |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2584 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5103 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1946 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 3066 mm |