1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 2000 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2000 GMC Yukon is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Yukon weights approximately 585 kg more than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Because 2000 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Yukon (442 Nm) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. (220 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 2000 GMC Yukon | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | GMC |
Model | 2600 | Yukon |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2584 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 220 Nm | 442 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2990 mm |