1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 2002 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2002 Pagani Zonda is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 7,010 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Pagani Zonda (542 HP) has 379 more horse power than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. (163 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 weights approximately 120 kg more than 2002 Pagani Zonda.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 2002 Pagani Zonda | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Pagani |
Model | 2600 | Zonda |
Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2584 cc | 7010 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 542 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2055 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1151 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2730 mm |