1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 2,584 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 (143 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Suzuki F1 weights approximately 250 kg more than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 (216 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Suzuki |
| Model | 2600 | F1 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2584 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 216 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1470 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 45 L |
