1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 2004 Pontiac Sunfire

To start off, 2004 Pontiac Sunfire is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 2,584 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 (163 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2004 Pontiac Sunfire. (140 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 should accelerate faster than 2004 Pontiac Sunfire. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 weights approximately 115 kg more than 2004 Pontiac Sunfire. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Pontiac Sunfire, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 (220 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Pontiac Sunfire. (203 Nm). This means 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Pontiac Sunfire.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 2004 Pontiac Sunfire
Make Alfa Romeo Pontiac
Model 2600 Sunfire
Year Released 1963 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2584 cc 2195 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 163 HP 140 HP
Engine RPM 5900 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 220 Nm 203 Nm
Engine Bore Size 83.1 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79.6 mm 94 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1370 kg 1255 kg
Vehicle Length 4380 mm 4630 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1740 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2650 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 53 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]