1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 2005 Nissan Altima

To start off, 2005 Nissan Altima is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 2,584 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Altima (175 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. (143 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Altima should accelerate faster than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Altima weights approximately 141 kg more than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Altima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Altima (244 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. (216 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Altima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 2005 Nissan Altima
Make Alfa Romeo Nissan
Model 2600 Altima
Year Released 1963 2005
Body Type Convertible Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2584 cc 2490 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 143 HP 175 HP
Engine RPM 5900 RPM 3600 RPM
Torque 216 Nm 244 Nm
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79.6 mm 100 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1220 kg 1361 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 4890 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1480 mm
Wheelbase Size 2590 mm 2760 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 100 L 76 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]