1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 2009 Chevrolet Captiva

To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 2,584 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 (143 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva. (135 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 41 kg more than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600.

Because 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva (220 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. (216 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 2009 Chevrolet Captiva
Make Alfa Romeo Chevrolet
Model 2600 Captiva
Year Released 1963 2009
Body Type Convertible SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2584 cc 2405 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 143 HP 135 HP
Engine RPM 5900 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 216 Nm 220 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 87.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79.6 mm 100 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 9.6:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 2 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1220 kg 1261 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 4640 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1860 mm
Wheelbase Size 2590 mm 2710 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 100 L 65 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]