1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 2010 Citroen C1

To start off, 2010 Citroen C1 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 2,584 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 (163 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 2010 Citroen C1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 should accelerate faster than 2010 Citroen C1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 weights approximately 570 kg more than 2010 Citroen C1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Citroen C1.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 2010 Citroen C1
Make Alfa Romeo Citroen
Model 2600 C1
Year Released 1963 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2584 cc 998 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 163 HP 67 HP
Engine RPM 5900 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 220 Nm 93 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3600 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.1 mm 73.7 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79.6 mm 82 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 10.8:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1370 kg 800 kg
Vehicle Length 4380 mm 3440 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1480 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1640 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2350 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 41 L