1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 2011 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2011 Kia Cadenza is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Kia Cadenza (200 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. (163 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 205 kg more than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cadenza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 2011 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Kia |
Model | 2600 | Cadenza |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2584 cc | 2700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2845 mm |