1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 1964 Alpine A 110
To start off, 1964 Alpine A 110 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 1,570 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia (115 HP) has 66 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A 110. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia weights approximately 475 kg more than 1964 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 1964 Alpine A 110 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Alpine |
| Model | Giulia | A 110 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1570 cc | 956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.1 mm | 65 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 72 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1470 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 38 L |
