1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 1968 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1968 Nissan Cedric is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia (115 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia should accelerate faster than 1968 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 240 kg more than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Nissan Cedric (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (145 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1968 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 1968 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Nissan |
Model | Giulia | Cedric |
Year Released | 1963 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2700 mm |