1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 1992 Chevrolet Corsica
To start off, 1992 Chevrolet Corsica is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 3,134 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Chevrolet Corsica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chevrolet Corsica (140 HP) has 25 more horse power than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chevrolet Corsica should accelerate faster than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chevrolet Corsica weights approximately 159 kg more than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chevrolet Corsica (244 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (145 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1992 Chevrolet Corsica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 1992 Chevrolet Corsica | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
| Model | Giulia | Corsica |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1570 cc | 3134 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 140 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 244 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.1 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 84 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1209 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2630 mm |
