1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 1992 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1992 Ford Tempo is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia (105 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1992 Ford Tempo. (97 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Tempo weights approximately 195 kg more than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Tempo (171 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (133 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 1992 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | Giulia | Tempo |
Year Released | 1963 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1569 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 171 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 93.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2540 mm |