1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 1995 Jaguar XJ220
To start off, 1995 Jaguar XJ220 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 3,492 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Jaguar XJ220 (968 Nm) has 835 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (133 Nm). This means 1995 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 1995 Jaguar XJ220 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Jaguar |
| Model | Giulia | XJ220 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1569 cc | 3492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 968 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
