1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 1998 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 1998 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz C (120 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 360 kg more than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mercedes-Benz C (170 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (145 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1998 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 1998 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Giulia | C |
Year Released | 1963 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 120 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.1 mm | 85.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 78.7 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 62 L |