1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2000 Citroen Xsara
To start off, 2000 Citroen Xsara is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia (115 HP) has 7 more horse power than 2000 Citroen Xsara. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen Xsara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 88 kg more than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen Xsara (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (145 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2000 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2000 Citroen Xsara | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Citroen |
Model | Giulia | Xsara |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.1 mm | 78.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 82 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1138 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 47 L |