1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2002 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Astro (187 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 900 kg more than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (145 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2002 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2002 Chevrolet Astro | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
| Model | Giulia | Astro |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1570 cc | 4294 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 187 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 339 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.1 mm | 102 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 88 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 117 L |
