1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2003 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP) has 85 more horse power than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 519 kg more than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu (298 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (145 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2003 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | Giulia | Malibu |
Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 298 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.1 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 84.1 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1569 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 62 L |