1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2004 Toyota Hi-Ace
To start off, 2004 Toyota Hi-Ace is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 2,237 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Hi-Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia (115 HP) has 14 more horse power than 2004 Toyota Hi-Ace. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota Hi-Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Hi-Ace weights approximately 480 kg more than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Hi-Ace (170 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (145 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2004 Toyota Hi-Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2004 Toyota Hi-Ace | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Toyota |
Model | Giulia | Hi-Ace |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 2237 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 101 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.1 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 86 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 16 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1530 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 70 L |