1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2004 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2004 Volvo XC90 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo XC90 (208 HP) has 93 more horse power than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 988 kg more than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo XC90 (320 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (145 Nm). This means 2004 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2004 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Volvo |
Model | Giulia | XC90 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 208 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 320 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 2038 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 72 L |