1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2005 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Musso is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Musso (118 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (105 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Musso should accelerate faster than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 896 kg more than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 SsangYong Musso (256 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (133 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2005 SsangYong Musso will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2005 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | SsangYong |
Model | Giulia | Musso |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1569 cc | 2874 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 256 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 92.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1866 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 73 L |