1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2006 Chevrolet Epica
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 1,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Epica (142 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Epica should accelerate faster than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 485 kg more than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Epica (195 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (145 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2006 Chevrolet Epica | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | Giulia | Epica |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 1993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 142 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.1 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 75.2 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 65 L |