1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2007 Jaguar XJ

To start off, 2007 Jaguar XJ is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jaguar XJ (300 HP) has 185 more horse power than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.

Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jaguar XJ (420 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 275 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (145 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2007 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia 2007 Jaguar XJ
Make Alfa Romeo Jaguar
Model Giulia XJ
Year Released 1963 2007
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1570 cc 4196 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 115 HP 300 HP
Torque 145 Nm 420 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 4100 RPM
Engine Bore Size 78.1 mm 86.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 82 mm 90.3 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4150 mm 5220 mm
Vehicle Width 1570 mm 1950 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2520 mm 3170 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 46 L 85 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]