1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2008 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2008 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 1,570 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia (115 HP) has 48 more horse power than 2008 Mitsubishi Colt. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia should accelerate faster than 2008 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 15 kg more than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mitsubishi Colt (160 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (145 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2008 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2008 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mitsubishi |
Model | Giulia | Colt |
Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 47 L |