1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 2,792 cc, 2010 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac BLS (247 HP) has 132 more horse power than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 510 kg more than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac BLS (350 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (145 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | Giulia | BLS |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 2792 cc |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 247 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 58 L |