1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2010 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Equinox (182 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (105 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 771 kg more than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Equinox (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (133 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2010 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | Giulia | Equinox |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1569 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1741 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2858 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 71 L |