1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2010 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Charger is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Charger (250 HP) has 135 more horse power than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Charger weights approximately 666 kg more than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Charger (339 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (145 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2010 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2010 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Dodge |
Model | Giulia | Charger |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 339 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1716 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 5083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1478 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3048 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 68 L |