1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 1,569 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia (105 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt. (54 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia should accelerate faster than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 480 kg more than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia (133 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt. (100 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2010 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mitsubishi |
Model | Giulia | Colt |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1569 cc | 1124 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 54 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 100 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 84.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 3640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 47 L |