1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2010 Toyota Sienna
To start off, 2010 Toyota Sienna is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Sienna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Sienna (266 HP) has 151 more horse power than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Sienna should accelerate faster than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Sienna weights approximately 845 kg more than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota Sienna (332 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (145 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota Sienna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2010 Toyota Sienna | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Toyota |
Model | Giulia | Sienna |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 266 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 332 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1895 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 5105 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1966 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 76 L |