1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2011 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Orlando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Orlando (139 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (105 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Orlando should accelerate faster than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Orlando weights approximately 558 kg more than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chevrolet Orlando (176 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (133 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2011 Chevrolet Orlando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2011 Chevrolet Orlando | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | Giulia | Orlando |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1569 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 176 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 88.2 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1528 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4652 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1633 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2760 mm |