1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2011 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 25 more horse power than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (129 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Because 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (133 Nm). This means 2011 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2011 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Citroen |
Model | Giulia | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1568 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 133 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 96 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |