1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2011 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2011 Honda CR-V is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Honda CR-V (180 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (105 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Honda CR-V weights approximately 566 kg more than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Honda CR-V (218 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (133 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2011 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2011 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Honda |
Model | Giulia | CR-V |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1569 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 218 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1536 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4554 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1819 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 58 L |