1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2011 Mazda 6
To start off, 2011 Mazda 6 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 6 (272 HP) has 157 more horse power than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda 6 weights approximately 559 kg more than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda 6 (364 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (145 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2011 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2011 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | Giulia | 6 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 272 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 364 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1609 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1839 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2789 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 70 L |