1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2013 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Malibu (180 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 592 kg more than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Malibu (244 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (145 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2013 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | Giulia | Malibu |
Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 180 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 244 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.1 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 98 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1642 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1854 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1462 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2738 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 60 L |