1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Cooper weights approximately 625 kg more than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Because 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Cooper (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (133 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Cooper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mini |
Model | Giulia | Cooper |
Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 640 kg | 1265 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 3961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1426 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2547 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 50 L |