1963 Alpine A 110 vs. 1962 BMW 3200 CS
To start off, 1963 Alpine A 110 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW 3200 CS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW 3200 CS would be higher. At 3,169 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 BMW 3200 CS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 BMW 3200 CS (160 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1963 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 BMW 3200 CS should accelerate faster than 1963 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 BMW 3200 CS weights approximately 925 kg more than 1963 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alpine A 110 | 1962 BMW 3200 CS | |
Make | Alpine | BMW |
Model | A 110 | 3200 CS |
Year Released | 1963 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 954 cc | 3169 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 75 L |