1963 Alpine A 110 vs. 1962 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1963 Alpine A 110 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 954 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Alpine A 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Alpine A 110 (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Alpine A 110 should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 DAF Daffodil weights approximately 90 kg more than 1963 Alpine A 110.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alpine A 110 | 1962 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Alpine | DAF |
Model | A 110 | Daffodil |
Year Released | 1963 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 954 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 85.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 65 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 33 L |