1963 Alpine A 110 vs. 1962 Holden FB Special
To start off, 1963 Alpine A 110 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden FB Special. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden FB Special would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Holden FB Special is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Holden FB Special (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1963 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Holden FB Special should accelerate faster than 1963 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Holden FB Special weights approximately 525 kg more than 1963 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alpine A 110 | 1962 Holden FB Special | |
Make | Alpine | Holden |
Model | A 110 | FB Special |
Year Released | 1963 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 954 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2670 mm |