1963 Alpine A 110 vs. 1964 Ford Taunus
To start off, 1964 Ford Taunus is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Ford Taunus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford Taunus (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1963 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford Taunus should accelerate faster than 1963 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Ford Taunus weights approximately 475 kg more than 1963 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alpine A 110 | 1964 Ford Taunus | |
Make | Alpine | Ford |
Model | A 110 | Taunus |
Year Released | 1963 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 954 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 60.1 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 45 L |