1963 Alpine A 110 vs. 1968 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1968 Cadillac Calais is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1963 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1963 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1530 kg more than 1963 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Alpine A 110 | 1968 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | Alpine | Cadillac |
| Model | A 110 | Calais |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1968 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 954 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 228 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 109.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 103.1 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 2105 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 82 L |
