1963 Alpine A 110 vs. 1972 Dodge Charger
To start off, 1972 Dodge Charger is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 6,555 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Dodge Charger (256 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1963 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1963 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Dodge Charger weights approximately 1135 kg more than 1963 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alpine A 110 | 1972 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Alpine | Dodge |
Model | A 110 | Charger |
Year Released | 1963 | 1972 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 954 cc | 6555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 110.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 85.9 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1970 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 3010 mm |