1963 Alpine A 110 vs. 2000 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2000 SsangYong Korando is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 2,873 cc (5 cylinders), 2000 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 SsangYong Korando (118 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1963 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 1963 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 SsangYong Korando weights approximately 1290 kg more than 1963 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Alpine A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alpine A 110 | 2000 SsangYong Korando | |
Make | Alpine | SsangYong |
Model | A 110 | Korando |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 954 cc | 2873 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 70 L |