1963 Alpine A 110 vs. 2001 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (222 HP) has 173 more horse power than 1963 Alpine A 110. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1963 Alpine A 110.
Because 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Alpine A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1963 Alpine A 110 has manual transmission. 1963 Alpine A 110 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alpine A 110 | 2001 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Alpine | Land Rover |
Model | A 110 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 954 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 222 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2550 mm |