1963 Alpine A 110 vs. 2001 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2001 Toyota Tundra is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 1963 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1963 Alpine A 110.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Toyota Tundra has automatic transmission and 1963 Alpine A 110 has manual transmission. 1963 Alpine A 110 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Toyota Tundra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alpine A 110 | 2001 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Alpine | Toyota |
Model | A 110 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 954 cc | 4700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 45 L |