1963 Alpine A 110 vs. 2002 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2002 Ford Ranger is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ranger (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1963 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1963 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 1145 kg more than 1963 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Alpine A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alpine A 110 | 2002 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Alpine | Ford |
Model | A 110 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 954 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 55 L |