1963 Alpine A 110 vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1963 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1963 Alpine A 110.
Because 2002 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Alpine A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Alpine A 110 | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Alpine | Jeep |
| Model | A 110 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 954 cc | 3960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2380 mm |
