1963 Alpine A 110 vs. 2005 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2005 Isuzu KB is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 2,998 cc, 2005 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Isuzu KB (129 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1963 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Isuzu KB should accelerate faster than 1963 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Isuzu KB weights approximately 1325 kg more than 1963 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Isuzu KB is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Alpine A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Isuzu KB will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alpine A 110 | 2005 Isuzu KB | |
Make | Alpine | Isuzu |
Model | A 110 | KB |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 954 cc | 2998 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 95.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 104.9 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1900 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 83 L |