1963 Alpine A 110 vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alpine A 110 would be higher.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Alpine A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Alpine A 110 | 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie | |
| Make | Alpine | Mitsubishi |
| Model | A 110 | Nessie |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2790 mm |
