1963 Alpine A 110 vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 2,834 cc, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1963 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1963 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 675 kg more than 1963 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alpine A 110 | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Alpine | Mitsubishi |
Model | A 110 | Colt |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 954 cc | 2834 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 100 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 95 L |