1963 Alpine A 110 vs. 2010 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC90 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo XC90 (200 HP) has 151 more horse power than 1963 Alpine A 110. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1963 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1580 kg more than 1963 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Alpine A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Alpine A 110 | 2010 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Alpine | Volvo |
| Model | A 110 | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 954 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 200 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 2155 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4808 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1897 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1783 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 80 L |
